The Simplest Save-Your-Business Chapter 13 Case

Here’s how to focus on running your business, by stopping your creditors from taking the wind out of your sails.

In the last few blogs I’ve been talking about some of the extra considerations that come into play when you own a business, are having financial troubles, and wonder if bankruptcy can help. No question—most of the time, having a business adds an extra layer of issues for me to help you work through in deciding whether bankruptcy is the best option, and then putting your case together if it is. But a business Chapter 13 case does not have to be complicated. Let’s take a very simple business situation, and walk it through a Chapter 13 case, to get a practical feel for how it works.

So let’s say Mark, a single 30-year old, started a handyman business when he lost his job three years ago. Before that he’d done about ten years of all kinds of construction and maintenance work, already owned all the tools he needed, and had even taken a few courses at the local community college in small business management because he’d always wanted to run his own business. He had good credit at the time, owed nothing but about $3,000 on some credit cards, plus had never been late on his modest mortgage. Mark had lived all his life in the same city, was the kind of guy who knew tons of people, and had well-earned reputation that he could fix anything. He put a lot of time into putting together a detailed and realistic business plan. He knew he should have some money saved up to get him past the start-up phase, but then the recession hit, he was out of work, and decided it was now or never. Besides, he had $7,000 of credit available on his credit cards if he got desperate.

His business started off slowly, partly because he didn’t have any money for advertizing. But he was creative and worked very hard building a customer base and a good business reputation. His income was creeping steadily upwards, but way too slowly. Over the course of the first year Mark maxed out his credit cards, and simply didn’t have enough money to pay income taxes to the IRS, falling behind $7,000 to them. Then during the second year he managed to service the credit card debt but couldn’t pay it down any, and fell behind another $7,000 to Uncle Sam. Then this last year, the IRS forced him to start making $500 monthly payments on his $14,000 debt, plus the estimated payments for the current year so that he didn’t continue falling further behind with them. As a result he’d gotten spotty on his credit card payments, which jacked up the interest rates and pushed him over the credit limits, piling on all kinds of fees. And now he’s missed a total of 4 payments on his mortgage, putting him $6,000 in arrears.

In the midst of all this his business now has steady—and still slowly increasing—income, Mark enjoys his work in spite of all the financial pressures, and believes he can keep growing it, especially if/when the economy improves. But the IRS has him in a vice, the credit cards creditors are sending their accounts to collection agencies, and his home is heading sooner or later to foreclosure.

A Chapter 13 case filed now for Mark would:

  • Stop the pressure by the IRS on the $14,000 debt, by cancelling the $500 payments, and giving him much longer—3-to-5 years—to pay that debt, usually with NO additional ongoing interest or “failure to pay” penalties, thus reducing the total amount to be paid to the IRS.
  • Stop collection efforts by the credit card creditors and collection agencies, who would only receive money AFTER he caught up on the house arrearage AND paid off all the taxes, with the amount received depending on what Mark could afford and how much in assets he needed to protect.
  • Immediately and consistently protect all his business and personal assets—tools and supplies, his business truck and/or personal vehicle, receivables owed by customers for prior work, and his business and personal bank and/or credit union accounts.
  • Allow him to focus on his business instead of his creditors, giving that business much more of a chance at success.
  • Get him debt-free–at the end of the 3-to-5 years Chapter 13 Plan, his mortgage would be current, he would owe nothing more to Uncle Sam, and he would have paid as much as he could afford on the credit cards, with the rest written off.

And the business that he loves, and in which he invested so much hope and dedication, would be alive and well.

/by

Basic Rules about Business Bankruptcy

If your business needs bankruptcy help, getting it done might not be much harder than a personal bankruptcy. But it depends on how your business is set up and how much you owe.

A couple blogs ago I said that I would soon explain some of the most important benefits of filing a business Chapter 13 case. And I said we’d start by assuming that your business is a sole proprietorship. In other words, the business and you are together legally as a single entity. That is, you have NOT set up your business as a separate legal entity–a corporation or limited liability company (LLC), or a formal or informal partnership.

But first, what if your business IS NOT a simple sole proprietorship, but instead is in one of these other forms?

If so, and you want to preserve your business through some kind of bankruptcy solution, I’ve got no choice but to start by telling you that it’s time (probably past the time) to have a meeting with a competent business bankruptcy attorney.  There are advantages and disadvantages of every form of doing business. But one practical disadvantage of running your business as a corporation/LLC/partnership is that this tends to make things significantly more complicated in the bankruptcy world.

That being said, here are a few straightforward things I can tell you that will make you just a bit more prepared when you visit me or another attorney:

1. Only an “individual” can file Chapter 13. Meaning that you and your sole proprietorship can together file a Chapter 13. But a corporation, or LLC, or partnership can’t.

2. Chapter 13s are sometimes called “wage-earner plans,” probably because one legal requirement is that you have a “regular income.” But that just means “income sufficiently stable and regular to… make payments under a plan under Chapter 13.” So if your sole proprietorship business income—combined with any other income—is even somewhat stable, you may well qualify under this requirement.

3.  But even if your business IS a sole proprietorship, you and your business together CAN’T file a Chapter 13 case if your total unsecured debt is $360,475 or more, or your total secured debt is $1,010,650 or more. These may seem like relatively high amounts but remember they include BOTH personal and business debts. Also the unsecured debt amounts can include less obvious ones such as the portions of your mortgages and other secured debts in excess of the value of the collateral. So a $750,000 debt secured by real estate now worth $550,000 equates to $200,000 in unsecured debt. And that’s before even looking at your regular unsecured debts.

4. If you are over one of the above debt limits, you can still file a Chapter 7 case, but that is almost never a way to save a business. Otherwise, your option is a Chapter 11, which is a hugely more complicated repayment procedure than Chapter 13.

5. A business corporation, LLC, or partnership can file a Chapter 11 case to keep the business afloat. But because of the very high attorney fees (easily 10 times the cost of a Chapter 13), and high filing fee plus ongoing court and U.S. Trustee fees, Chapter 11 is unfortunately not a practical solution for most small businesses. One of the biggest shortcomings in the bankruptcy world is the lack of a cost-effective method to deal with small business reorganizations. Many local bankruptcy courts have tried to address this with streamlined “fast-track” Chapter 11s, but the cost is often still prohibitively high.

As I said, if you are trying to save your financially struggling business, it is very important that you get competent business bankruptcy advice, and as soon as possible. You have likely been working extremely hard at trying to keep your business alive. Now you need a game plan to start directing your energies in a constructive direction.

/by

Can an Individual Chapter 7 Case Ever Save Your Business?

Chapter 13 can be a great way to keep certain small businesses afloat, but how about Chapter 7? Can’t it ever be a simpler and cheaper way to do so?

In my last blog I said that Chapter 7 is “seldom the right option if you own a business that you want to keep operating.”  The reason I gave for this is that Chapter 7 is a “liquidating bankruptcy,” so the bankruptcy trustee could make you surrender any valuable components of your business. These comments deserve more of an explanation.

At the moment a Chapter 7 bankruptcy is filed, all of the assets of the debtor (the person on whose behalf the case is filed) are automatically transferred to a new legal entity called the bankruptcy “estate.” A trustee is assigned to oversee this estate, which in most cases means that the trustee focuses on whether or not there are any estate assets worth collecting and distributing to creditors. The debtor can protect, or “exempt,” certain categories and amounts of assets, which remain the debtor’s and can’t be taken by the trustee. The idea is that people filing bankruptcy should be allowed to keep a minimum threshold of assets upon which to base their fresh financial start. In the vast majority of consumer Chapter 7 cases, the debtor can “exempt from property of the estate” all of the assets, leaving nothing for the trustee to collect.  This is called a “no-asset” estate.

If you own a business, can you file a Chapter 7 case and still continue operating the business?  That breaks down into two questions.

The first question is whether you can exempt all of the value of the business from the property of the bankruptcy estate, with the business either as a “going concern” or broken up into its asset components.

Many very small businesses are operated by and are completely reliant for their survival on the services of its one or two owners.  IF so, they cannot be sold as a “going concern”—an operating business—separate from their owners. So when faced with this kind of situation, a Chapter 7 trustee must consider whether he or she can sell any of the various assets that make up the business, or whether instead the debtor can exempt all of these business assets.

The assets of a very small business can include tools and equipment, receivables (money owed by customers for goods or services previously provided), supplies, inventory, and cash on hand or in an account. Sometimes the business will have some value in a brand name or trademark, a below-market lease, or in some other unusual asset.  

Whether a business’ assets are exempt depends on the nature and value of those assets, and on the particular exemptions that apply to them. By way of examples, it is not unusual for a small business to own nothing more than a modest amount of business equipment, and in such cases the applicable state or federal “tool of trade” exemption may well cover all that equipment. So indeed, it is possible for a debtor who owns a business to have a no-asset Chapter 7 estate.

But that’s when we get to the second question: is the trustee willing to let the business continue operating in spite of its potential liability risks for the estate?

What’s this about “liability risks”? Remember that everything you own, including your business, immediately becomes part of the bankruptcy estate when your bankruptcy case is file. So in effect, your business becomes the trustee’s to operate. And that means that the estate becomes potentially liable for damages caused by the business. The classic example: a debtor who is a residential roofing subcontractor, drops a load of shingles on someone the day after filing a Chapter 7 case, and is then sued by the injured party. The bankruptcy estate, and arguably the trustee, may well be liable. That is why the Chapter 7 trustees’ mantra about an ongoing business is “shut it down.”

There may be exceptions. It depends on the trustee, the nature of the business, and whether the business has sufficient liability insurance. It is their judgment call, and so this is very much area where you want to be represented by an attorney who knows all of the trustees on the local Chapter 7 trustee panel and how they will respond to this issue.

 So, there’s no question that it is risky to file a Chapter 7 case when you want to continue operating a business. You need to be confident that the business assets are exempt from the bankruptcy estate, and that the trustee will not require the closing of the business to avoid any potential business liability.

And that’s without even getting into details such as your potential loss of control of the business to the trustee, and the potential loss of business’ ongoing income to the estate.

I might well have not stated it strongly enough when I said that Chapter 7 is “seldom the right option if you own a business that you want to keep operating.”  It would take a rare set of circumstances for Chapter 7 to be the best way to go.

 

/by

Bankruptcy Can Save Your Business

Bankruptcy isn’t just for cleaning up after the death of a business. It can keep your business alive.

Bankruptcy saved General Motors. That business got out of a lot of it debt and restructured its operations, and ended up saving a lot of jobs. If you operate your own small business, bankruptcy may be able to save your job, too.

Let’s assume you have a very small, very simple business. One so simple that you did not form a corporation or any other kind of legal entity when you set up the business. And to keep this blog simple, assume you don’t have any partners.  You own and operate your business by yourself for yourself, in what the law calls a sole proprietorship.

There are advantages and disadvantages of operating your business this way. For better or worse you and your business are legally treated pretty much as a single unit—unlike a corporation which owns its own assets and has its own debts distinct from the owner(s). In the right circumstances, a sole proprietorship is a much easier type of business to deal with in a bankruptcy.

Chapter 7, “straight bankruptcy,” is seldom the right option if you own a business that you want to keep operating during and after the bankruptcy. Chapter 7 is also called “liquidating bankruptcy.” You can write off (“discharge”) your debts in return for liquidation—the surrender of your assets to the trustee to sell and distribute to your creditors. Except that in most Chapter 7 cases everything you own is protected–“exempt”—so that you lose nothing or very little. But if you own an ongoing business, although some of the assets of an ongoing business may be exempt, usually not all of them are.  So the Chapter 13 trustee could require you to give crucial parts of your business to him or her to liquidate.

Instead, a Chapter 13 case—ironically sometimes misnamed a “wage-earner plan”—is much better designed to enable you keep your personal and business assets. You get immediate relief from your creditors, and for a much longer period of time, usually along with a significant reduction in the amount of debt to be repaid.  So Chapter 13 helps both your immediate cash flow and the business’ long-term prospects. It is also an excellent way to address tax debts, often a major issue for struggling businesses. Overall, it is a relatively inexpensive tool that combines the discipline of a court-approved plan of payments to creditors with the flexibility of allowing you to continue operating your business.

In the next few blogs I’ll explain some of the most important benefits of filing a business Chapter 13 case. But in the meantime, please understand that when you own ANY kind of business, solving your financial problems will be more complicated.  Sometimes only a little more complicated, other times much more so. Because we’re not just dealing with the size and timing of a paycheck, but rather with all the financial and practical aspects of running a business. Plus, issues of timing are often important in business bankruptcy cases, requiring more pre-bankruptcy planning to chart the best path for you. So, no matter how small your business, be sure to get competent legal advice, and do so as soon as possible. You have a lot at stake.

 

/by

Persistently High U.S. Unemployment Rate Linked to High Household Debt

Why is the unemployment rate staying so high, years after the recession officially ended? If we knew the answer to this question, we’d have a fighting chance at addressing the problem.

In our national economy of 300 million people, it’s not easy to tease out what’s keeping the unemployment rate so high so long. But one just-published study caught my eye because it gives an answer that seems to make sense. It takes a creative look at the connection between high household debt and the unemployment rate.

Now it may sound like common sense to say that if the bottom drops out of a population’s most valuable commodity—their homes—so that their debts exceed their assets, these people are either going to have much less money to spend or be less comfortable about spending money they have. So the goods and services they are no longer buying means unemployment for whoever was providing those goods and services.

But some argue that there are other more important causes of high unemployment. One example is the “argument that businesses are holding back hiring because of regulatory or financial uncertainty.” Another one is that shifts in the global market require unemployed people to retrain, keeping unemployment high while they do so. All of these theories seem to make some sense, but the point of economics is to figure out which of these is really the cause. Or if all three contribute to unemployment, economists are supposed to calculate how much each one does.

So this study determines that high household debt, especially mortgage debt, is the primary reason for unemployment, causing at least 65% of the current unemployment.

Before the start of the Great Recession there was huge variation across the country in the amount of household debt, tending to be highest where the housing prices had climbed the most. For example, the household debt-to-income ratio in California was 4.7 while in Texas was only 2.0. This study looked closely at the differences in employment losses in high- and low-debt counties, distinguishing between losses in employment sectors primarily catering to the local population—such as local restaurants, personal services—and those with a national base—such as manufacturing, call centers. Unemployment rates in the local employment sectors were much worse in the high-debt counties than the low-debt ones, whereas unemployment rates in the nation-based employment sectors were similar in both high-debt and low-debt counties.

Although this may sound somewhat commonsensical, these results did not support other possible justifications for the persistent high unemployment. The study results did not support that jobs were not being created because of governmental or economic uncertainty (think Washington deficit reduction stalemate or the Eurozone crisis) or because of a retraining time gap.

Instead “weak household balance sheets and the resulting  … demand shock [that is, overleveraged consumers not having or spending money] are the main reasons for historically high unemployment in the U.S. economy.”

This seems to mean that high unemployment will be with us as long as a large percentage of homeowners are underwater on their homes. Is anybody in Washington even working on this problem?

/by

Chapter 13 Conquers Both Older and Newer Income Taxes

If you owe a number of years of income tax debt, Chapter 13 allows you to favor those taxes that have to be favored, while dumping the taxes that can be dumped.

In my last blog I gave an example showing how Chapter 13 can be an extremely good way to handle income tax debts particularly when you owe multiple years of taxes. In that hypothetical case, without a bankruptcy a couple would have had to pay about $30,000 to the IRS for back taxes, plus about another $45,000 in medical bills and credit cards, a total of $75,000. And paying this huge sum of money on their income would have taken them many, many years of pressure and uncertainty. In huge contrast, in a Chapter 13 case this same couple would only need to pay about $17,500, less than 1/4th the amount. And they would be allowed to do so through pre-arranged affordable monthly payments, for three years, all the while not having to worry about aggressive actions by any of their creditors, including the IRS.

How does Chapter 13 pull this off?

1) Tax debts that are old enough are lumped in with the lowest priority “general unsecured” creditors—like medical bills and credit cards—and so in many cases do not need to be paid anything unless there is enough “disposable income” to do so. This means that often those taxes are paid either nothing—as in the example—or  only a few pennies on the dollar.

2) The more recent “priority” taxes DO have to be paid in full in a Chapter 13 case, along with interest accrued until the filing of the case, but a) penalties—which can be a large part of the debt—are treated like “general unsecured” debts rather than “priority” ones, and 2) usually interest or penalties stop when the Chapter 13 is filed. These can significantly reduce the amount of tax that has to be paid.

3) “Priority” taxes are paid in a Chapter 13 case before and instead of “general unsecured” debts. This often means that having these taxes to pay simply reduces the amount of money which would otherwise have gone to those “general unsecured” creditors. So sometimes, amazingly, having tax debt does not increase the amount paid in a Chapter 13 case. In our example, the couple paid about $500 per month for three years, which is the same amount they would have paid even if they did not owe a dime to the IRS! They met their obligations under Chapter 13 by paying the IRS instead of their other creditors.

4) The bankruptcy law that stops creditors from trying to collect their debts while a bankruptcy case is active—the “automatic stay”—is just as binding on the IRS as on any other creditor. The IRS can continue to do some very limited and sensible things like demand the filing of a tax return or conduct an audit, but it can’t use the aggressive collection tools that the law otherwise grants to it. Gaining relief from collection pressure from the IRS AND all the rest of the creditors is one of the biggest benefits of Chapter 13.

I confess that I put this example together in a way that would showcase the advantages of Chapter 13 in dealing with income tax debts. If the facts were different, the advantages could easily be less. If, for instance, more of the taxes were “priority” debts that had to be paid, the debtors would have to pay more, either through larger monthly payments or for a longer period of time. There are definitely situations where it is a close call choosing between Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, or possibly even not filing bankruptcy at all but doing an offer in compromise with the IRS. To decide what is best for you, you need the independent advice of an experienced bankruptcy attorney, who is ethically and legally bound to look out for your best interests. Regardless whether your tax debts and other circumstances point strongly in one direction or it’s a closer call, you need a professional qualified both to help you make an informed decision and then to execute on it.  

/by

Chapter 13 Tames Your Income Tax Monster

A “straight” Chapter 7 can write off some income taxes. But if you owe recent taxes, or multiple years of taxes, Chapter 13 is usually a much better way to go. It often provides tremendous advantages over both Chapter 7 and dealing with the IRS on your own.

I’ll illustrate this with an example, and then explain it in my next blog.

Let’s say a husband and wife owe $35,000 in a combination of medical bills and credit cards, requiring monthly payments of $800. After the husband lost his long-time job back in 2006, he followed his dream of starting a business, which was starting to make progress when it got hammered in the Great Recession. He closed it in 2010 and found a reliable job a number of months later, although one where he earns 30% less than he did at the one lost years earlier. His business had generated some income, but barely enough for the couple to meet their bare essentials. So there was no money to pay the quarterly estimated taxes, and they had no money to pay the amount due when they filed their joint tax returns for 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010. They expect to come out even for the 2011 tax year because of tax withholdings from their wages. To try to simplify the facts, assume they owe the IRS $4,000 in taxes, $750 in penalties, and $250 in interest for each of those five years. So their total IRS debt for those years is $25,000—including $20,000 in the original taxes, $3,750 in penalties, and $1,250 in interest. The wife has had consistent employment throughout this time, with pay raises only enough to keep up with inflation. They filed each of the tax returns in mid-April when they were due, and have been making modest payments when they have been able to, but those have not even been keeping up with the penalties and interest. Assume they have no secured debts—no mortgage or vehicle loans. They can realistically afford to pay about $500 a month to all of their creditors, not enough to pay their regular creditors much less the IRS.

Outside of bankruptcy, the IRS would likely require payment in full of the entire tax obligation, with interest and sometimes penalties continuing to accrue until everything was paid in full. Their payments would be imposed without regard to the other debts they owe. And if the couple failed to make their payments, the IRS would likely try to collect through garnishments and tax liens. Depending how long repayment would take, the couple could easily end up paying $30,000 or more with additional interest and penalties. This would be in addition to their $35,000 medical and credit card debts, which could easily increase to $45,000 or more, especially if these other debts went to collections or lawsuits. That’s likely because the couple would be paying all available money to the IRS. So likely the couple would eventually end up paying at least $75,000 to their creditors.  

In a Chapter 13 case, the 2006 and 2007 taxes, interest and penalties would very likely be paid nothing and discharged at the end of the case. So would the penalties for 2008, 2009, and 2010. That takes care of $11,500 of the $25,000 present tax debt. The remaining $13,500 of taxes and interest for 2008, 2009, and 2010 would have to be paid as a “priority” debt, although without any additional interest or penalties once the Chapter 13 case is filed. Adding in some “administrative expenses” (the Chapter 13 trustee and our attorney fees), and assuming that their income qualified them for a three-year Chapter 13 plan, this couple would likely be allowed to pay about $500 per month to ALL of their creditors—credit cards and medical, AND the IRS. Then after three years, they’d be done. The “priority” portion of the IRS debt would have been paid in full, but the older IRS debt and all the penalties would be discharged likely without any payment. So would the credit card and medical debts. After the three years, the couple would have paid a total of around $17,500 (including the “administrative expenses”), instead of about $75,000 without the Chapter 13. They’d be done instead of barely starting to pay their mountain of debt. And they would have not spent the last three years worrying about IRS garnishments and tax liens, lawsuits and harassing phone calls, and the constant lack of money for necessities.

As I said, in my next blog I’ll explain how all this works.

/by

Record Corporate Profits Are Not Lowering Unemployment Rate

U.S. corporations are making record profits quarter after quarter, yet unemployment seems to be stuck at a devastatingly high rate. Why aren’t these financially flush big businesses hiring?

I’ve been writing a string of blogs about how tax debts are dealt with in bankruptcy, and I’ll get back to that after today. This is the time of year when the nation’s major corporations report their 3rd quarterly profits, and so I found myself scratching my head about the disconnect between their huge profits and their lack of hiring. So I read a number of news stories and editorials and this is what I got out of them:

1.  Big businesses have gotten to be more “productive,” in the sense of producing more goods and services with less labor. That has happened partly through investments in labor-saving technology and partly by requiring employees to work harder and faster for the same pay. With the cut-throat labor market, companies don’t need to increase salaries to retain or replace their employees.

2.  Profits have increased because a larger percentage of sales for large U.S. corporations have been overseas. Around 40 per cent of their profits are from foreign sales. For many companies, sales are growing modestly in the U.S. while growing much faster elsewhere, especially in the “emerging markets” of China, India, and South America.  

3.  Relatively strong overseas sales come with job growth overseas instead of here. According to the U.S. Commerce Department, in the past decade, U.S.-based multi-national corporations added 2.4 million jobs outside the country while cutting 2.4 million jobs here. Jobs naturally grow where sales are growing–someone has to take customer orders at the 3,000+ KFCs in China! But of course there’s also increased foreign outsourcing of work that used to be done here, from manufacturing to computer programming.

4. Normally when businesses are more productive, resulting in more profits, they tend to expand, thus creating more employment opportunities. But this has not been happening for three reasons.

a. With the double-whammy of very high unemployment and loss of home values, U.S. consumers either don’t have the means or the attitude to spend money, so companies are leery about expanding to increase production.

b. The international business environment—particularly the European sovereign debt crises in Greece, Italy and elsewhere—is making big business cautious.

c. Political gridlock in Washington, D.C. makes business planning very difficult. With the Congressional deficit-reduction “super committee” scheduled to issue its report very shortly, big businesses have been sitting tight to see if this “super committee” will come up with its momentous compromise, and what it’ll consist of.

The bottom line: big businesses don’t need to hire to produce the goods and services they are producing, at least within the U.S., and they don’t want to expand and hire here because of lackluster consumer demand and high uncertainty in the world economy and in domestic politics.

/by

Four Hoops to Jump Through to Write Off Income Taxes in Bankruptcy

The conditions you have to meet to write off an income tax debt actually make sense. And understanding those conditions is a lot easier if you understand the sense behind them.

In my last blog I introduced the four conditions for discharging taxes in a Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy,” and said I’d explain them in this blog today.

This is made easier by the fact that there is a single principle behind all four of these conditions: bankruptcy law believes that taxpayers who pretty much follow the tax laws should be able to write off their tax debts just like the rest of their other debts, after first giving the IRS (or other tax authority) a sensible amount of time to collect the taxes.

How long is this sensible amount of time? How much of an opportunity do the tax authorities have to collect before you can discharge the tax debt? Each of the four conditions measures this amount of time differently, based on 1) when the tax return for the particular income tax was due, 2) when the tax return was actually filed, 3) when the tax was “assessed,” and 4) whether the tax return that was filed was honest and therefore reflected the right amount of tax debt when it was filed. You must meet all four of these conditions, all four of these measures of time.

Taking them one at a time:

1) Three years since tax return due: Every income tax debt has a fixed point in time when its return had to be filed. That date is extended by a certain number of months if you asked for an extension, but it’s still a fixed point in time, one that can be easily ascertained. So this first condition gives the tax authorities three years to collect, three years from a fixed point not affected by your actions (the timing of filing the return) or their actions (audits, legal disputes).

2) Two years since tax return actually filed: In contrast, this is a time period triggered by your own action. Notice above when I stated the overall principle at work here, I said you must “pretty much” follow the tax law. Thus you can file a tax return late and still be able to discharge the debt if at least two years has passed since you filed the return.

3) 240 days since assessment: Assessment is the tax authority’s formal determination of your tax liability, usually by its review and acceptance of your tax return. Normally an income tax is assessed within a few weeks that it is received, so the 240 days since assessment usually passes way before the above three-year or two-year time periods. But the law has to account for the less common situations when assessment is delayed. So, when a tax is subject to a lengthy audit or litigation, or an “offer-in-compromise” (a taxpayer’s formal offer to settle), and the three-year and two-year periods have passed, the tax authority still has 240 days after assessment to chase that tax debt.

4) Fraudulent tax returns and tax evasion: This last condition essentially says that none of the above time periods are triggered at all if you are intentionally dishonest on your tax return or try to avoid paying the tax in some other way. If you are cheating on your taxes then the tax authority has no opportunity to collect the debt, so you cannot discharge the debt, no matter how old the tax is.

If your tax debt can jump through these four hoops, you should be able to discharge that tax in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

But what if you owe taxes which do not meet these four conditions? What if some of your taxes do but others do not? Or what if the IRS has recorded a tax lien? Or if a lot of the taxes came from operating a business, or are not income taxes but some other kind? I’ll tell you about these situations in my next blogs.

/by

Writing Off Income Taxes with a “Straight Bankruptcy”

You don’t always need to file a Chapter 13 case—with its 3-to-5-year payment plan–to deal with income tax debts. Thinking that you do is a myth, alongside the broader myth that “you can’t write off taxes in a bankruptcy.” Both have a kernel of truth, which is why they persist. It’s true: some taxes cannot be discharged (legally written off) in bankruptcy. But some can. And it’s true: Chapter 13 is often an excellent way to solve tax problems. But that does not necessarily mean it is the best for you. Instead Chapter 7 might be.

Chapter 13 tends to be the better tool if you owe a string of income tax debts including relatively recent ones. Why? Because in this situation Chapter 13 gives you the best of both worlds. First, if you owe recent income taxes which cannot be discharged, you get lots of advantages under Chapter 13, including paying less by avoiding most penalties and interest. That can be a huge savings, especially if you can afford only relatively small payments. Second, if you have older back taxes, these are also wrapped into the Chapter 13 plan, often without you paying any more into your plan, then they are discharged at the end of your case.

But you DON’T NEED the best of both worlds if all or most of your income tax debts are dischargeable. Then Chapter 7, the straightforward “straight” bankruptcy is enough.

So, WHAT ARE the conditions for a specific income tax debt to be discharged in Chapter 7? How are you going to know if Chapter 7 will discharge all or most of your taxes so that it is the right option for you?

Some of the conditions for discharge of taxes are quite straightforward. Some are more complicated. And as you’ll see, some are even purposely vague. So unfortunately it’s not as simple as plugging a particular tax debt into a clear formula to see if it is dischargeable. Determining whether a particular tax debt will be discharged requires the careful judgment of an experienced attorney.

I’ll just list these conditions for discharging income taxes here, and then explain them in my next blog. Don’t be surprised if they sound confusing in this list. It’s true: anything having to do with taxes tends to be complicated!

To discharge an income tax debt in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, it must meet these conditions:

1) Three years since tax return due: The applicable tax return must have been due more than three years before you file your Chapter 7 case. And if you requested any extensions for filing the applicable tax returns, you have to add that extra time to this three-year period.

2) Two years since tax return actually filed: Regardless when the tax return was due, you must have filed at least two years before your bankruptcy is filed in court.

3) 240 days since assessment: The taxing authority must have assessed the tax more than 240 days before the bankruptcy filing.

4) Fraudulent tax returns and tax evasion: You cannot have filed a “fraudulent return” or “willfully attempted in any manner to evade or defeat such tax.”

You can see that these are begging for some clarification. For that please come back to read my next blog. Or else call to set up a consultation with me. If you have substantial tax debts, you should definitely get some thorough personal advice. Know your options so you can make an informed choice, about bankruptcy and otherwise.

/by