You Can Write Off Some Income Taxes with a “Straight Bankruptcy”

Chapter 13 can be a great way to deal with tax debts. But you don’t always need it, or its 3-to-5-year payment plan.

 

Chapter 7 vs. 13 for Income Taxes

Thinking that the only way to handle your income tax debts in bankruptcy is through Chapter 13 is a misunderstanding of the law. It’s an angle on the broader error thinking that you can’t write off taxes in a bankruptcy.

Both are understandable mistakes.

It is true that some taxes cannot be discharged (legally written off) in bankruptcy. But some can be.

And it is true that Chapter 13 can be the best way to solve many income tax problems. But that does not necessarily mean it is the best for you. Chapter 7 might be instead.

When Chapter 13 Is Better

Chapter 13 tends to be the better option if you owe a string of income tax debts, and especially if some are relatively recent ones. That’s because in these situations Chapter 13 solves two huge problems in one package.

First, if you owe recent income taxes which cannot be discharged, you get lots of advantages under Chapter 13, including paying less by avoiding most penalties and interest. That can be a huge savings, especially if you can afford only relatively small payments. Indeed the amount you pay each month is based on what you can afford to pay. You can often even hold off on paying anything towards the back taxes while you first pay even more important debts—such as back child support, or home mortgage arrearage.

Second, if you have older back taxes, under Chapter 13 you pay these only to the extent that you can afford to do so after first paying your more recent taxes. Then whatever of these older taxes are not paid during your case are discharged at the end of it.

When Chapter 7 is Better

But you don’t need the Chapter 13 package if all or most of your income tax debts are dischargeable. In that situation, the generally much simpler Chapter 7 could be enough.

So, what makes an income tax debt dischargeable under Chapter 7?

The Conditions for Discharging Income Taxes

Some of the conditions for determining which taxes can be discharged are quite straightforward, but some are more complicated. It’s not as simple as applying a simple formula to any particular tax debt to see if it is dischargeable. Figuring out whether a particular tax debt will be discharged requires the careful judgment of an experienced attorney.

The conditions for discharging income taxes are listed here, and then will be explained in the next blog. As listed, they may well not make perfect sense, so make sure you see the next blog post.

To discharge an income tax debt in a Chapter 7 case, it must meet these conditions:

1) 3 years since tax return due: The tax return for the pertinent tax must have been due more than three years before you file your Chapter 7 case. Also, if you requested any extensions for filing the applicable tax returns, add that extra time to this three-year period.

2) 2 years since tax return actually filed: Regardless when the tax return was due, you must have filed at least two years before your bankruptcy is filed in court.

3) 240 days since “assessment”: The taxing authority must have assessed the tax more than 240 days before the bankruptcy filing.

4) Fraudulent tax returns and tax evasion: You cannot file a “fraudulent return” or “willfully attempt in any manner to evade or defeat such tax.”

These four conditions need clarification, which will be provided in the next blog post.

/by

The Persistent Myth About Taxes and Bankruptcy

Many people believe that bankruptcy can’t write off any income taxes. Even attorneys sometimes perpetuate this myth.


Occasional Attorney Misinformation

The following dialog was found on a video of a bankruptcy attorney’s website showing the attorney being interviewed. In response to a question by the interviewer whether there were some debts that can’t be “touched” in a bankruptcy, the attorney responded:  

“Absolutely. Things like child support, alimony, uh, tax debts, student loans. Those generally aren’t dischargeable.”

The interviewer: 

“So the government’s gonna help you eliminate some of the debt in a bankruptcy. But not the debt to them.”

The attorney quipped:

“Not theirs, of course!”

Putting tax debts in the same category as child support and alimony—which indeed cannot ever be legally written off, or discharged—is wrong because income taxes CAN be discharged, as soon as they are old enough.

It is at the very least highly misleading for the attorney to say that tax debts “generally aren’t dischargeable” while including it with support debts that are never dischargeable, or student loans which are very rarely dischargeable.

Upcoming Answers about Taxes and Bankruptcy

Through the next few blog posts, you’ll learn what taxes can be discharged and what can’t. The fact is that bankruptcy can discharge taxes of many types and in many situations. Sometimes ALL of a taxpayer’s taxes can be discharged, or most of them. But there ARE significant limitations, which I will explain carefully.

Bankruptcy Can Help Deal with Taxes in Many Ways Beyond Potentially Writing Them Off

Besides the possibility that you will be able to discharge some or all of your taxes, bankruptcy can also:

1. Stop the tax authorities from garnishing your wages and bank accounts, and levying on (seizing) your personal and business assets.

2. Prevent them from gaining greater leverage against you, through tax liens and cumulating penalties and interest.

3. Avoid being forced to pay monthly payments directly to the tax authorities, with the monthly amounts dictated without sufficiently considering your other legal obligations and reasonable living expense.

Overall, bankruptcy gives you unique leverage against the IRS and/or your state/local tax authority. It gives you a lot more control over a very powerful class of creditors. Your tax problems are resolved not piecemeal but rather as part of your entire financial package. So you don’t find yourself focusing on your taxes while worrying about the rest of your creditors. 

 

/by

Don’t Let a Creditor Get a Judgment Preventing its Debt from Being Written Off in Bankruptcy

Some creditor judgments are very dangerous since the prevent you from writing off the debt later in bankruptcy. Try to avoid judgments.

 

Consequences of Allowing a Judgment

In recent blog posts we’ve written about the most direct reason to avoid letting a creditor which has sued you get a judgment against you–it gives the creditor powerful ways to make you pay the debt, such as by garnishing your paychecks or bank accounts. Also, if you own any real estate, including your home, a judgment usually creates a lien on your real estate, another way to force you to pay the debt.

But there’s another reason we mentioned earlier–you should avoid a judgment whenever possible because it can result in that debt not being written off (“discharged”) when you file bankruptcy. Or even if that debt can be discharged, it may become much more difficult to do so. This blog post is about these kinds of judgments.

How a Judgment Can Affect Whether a Debt Can Later Be Discharged

So how can a judgment turn a debt that could have been discharged into one that can’t, or is much harder to discharge?

A very basic principle of law states that once one court has decided an issue, other courts must respect that decision. The idea is that litigants should be able to use court resources only once to resolve a specific dispute. Once a court decides an issue, the losing party shouldn’t be able to hunt around for another court to hear and decide the same dispute (except for appeals to a higher court).

The original court—usually a state court—could potentially resolve a lawsuit in a way that would later makes the debt not dischargeable under bankruptcy law. A creditor could allege that the person owing the debt incurred it in some fraudulent or inappropriate way. If the lawsuit is resolved with the judgment reflecting that that’s what happened, then later when the debtor files bankruptcy the bankruptcy court would likely be bound by that decision by the original court. The judgment having been previously entered by the original court, the debtor would not have an opportunity to challenge its conclusions after filing bankruptcy.

Many Judgments Do NOT Cause Discharge Problems

Most creditor lawsuits are about only one thing: whether the debt is legally owed. So the judgments arising from such lawsuits usually establish nothing more than that the debt is a valid debt, at a certain amount, plus certain fees and interest. Such judgments, which don’t make any determination about a debtor’s fraudulent or otherwise inappropriate behavior, do not impact the discharge of the underlying debt in a subsequent bankruptcy.

It’s Safer to File Bankruptcy Before a Judgment is Entered

The problem is that it’s not always clear what exactly the initial lawsuit decided in its judgment, and thus whether the judgment makes the debt not dischargeable or at least harder to discharge. Specifically, the language of the judgment may not mesh exactly with the bankruptcy laws about fraudulent debts, which makes difficult to determine whether that issue is still open for determination by the bankruptcy court.

A related question is whether the matter was “actually litigated” if the person against whom the judgment was entered did not appear to defend the lawsuit or did not have an attorney.  In other words you may or may not be able to get your day in bankruptcy court depending on whether in the eyes of the law you really already had your day in the prior court.  

To avoid these kinds of ambiguities, and to avoid the risk of losing your chance to defend your case in bankruptcy court, don’t wait until after a judgment has been entered against you to see a bankruptcy attorney. This is especially critical if a lawsuit’s allegations against you refer to any inappropriate behavior other than not repaying the debt.

The bottom line is that if you get sued by any creditor you should quickly see an attorney, even if you don’t plan on fighting the lawsuit. Getting to an attorney quickly enables you to learn if the lawsuit could lead to a judgment making the debt not dischargeable, or more difficult to discharge, in bankruptcy. If so, you would then have the option of filing the bankruptcy to prevent such a harmful judgment from being entered, instead of being stuck with it if you file a bankruptcy later.

 

/by

Qualify for a Vehicle Loan “Cramdown” by Filing Your Chapter 13 Case at the Right Time

Potentially save thousands of dollars on your vehicle loan by filing bankruptcy when it qualifies for cramdown.


This is the final one of a series of four blog posts on the advantages of filing bankruptcy at the legally opportune time. The last three blogs covered the effect of timing on whether you file a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 case, on which debts can be discharged, and on what assets you can keep. Today’s applies only to Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts” cases, because vehicle loan cramdowns cannot be done under Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy.”

Chapter 13 Vehicle Loan Cramdown

What’s a “cramdown”? It’s an informal term—not found in the federal Bankruptcy Code—for a procedure provided under Chapter 13 law for legally rewriting the loan to reduce, usually, both the monthly payment and the total you pay for the vehicle. A cramdown, essentially reduces the amount you must pay to the fair market value of your vehicle, often also reducing the interest rate, and also often stretching out the payments over a longer period. These combine to result often in a significantly reduced monthly payment, and an overall savings of thousands of dollars.

Qualifying for Cramdown

First, this only works if your vehicle is worth less than the balance on the loan.

Second, emphasizing again, it is ONLY available in a Chapter 13 case, not Chapter 7.

And third, your vehicle loan must have been entered into more than 910 days (slightly less than two and a half years) before your Chapter 13 case is filed.

Vehicle Cramdown

It’s of course that last condition that creates the timing opportunity. When you first go in to see your attorney, bring your loan vehicle paperwork (or as much information you have) to see if and when you qualify for cramdown, and whether and how much difference it can make for you.

Here’s an example of the dollar difference that a difference in timing can make.

How Good Timing Can Work for You

Let’s say you bought and financed your car 900 days ago—that’s almost two and a half years. The new car cost $21,500. You did not get a very good deal; your previous car had died and cost way too much to repaid, and you had to quickly get another car to commute to work. You put down $500 (from a credit card cash advance), then financed the vehicle for $21,000 at 8% over a term of 5 years, with monthly payments of $425.

Now almost two and a half years later you owe about $11,500. If you wanted to keep the car, and filed either a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 case before the 910-day mark, you would have to pay the regular monthly payments for the rest of the contract term. With interest, that would cost a total of about $12,650 more.

Consider if instead you waited until just past that 910-day mark and filed a Chapter 13 case then, and could “cram down” the car loan. Assume that your car is now worth $7,500, and again you owe $11,500. The loan is said to be secured to the extent of $7,500. The remaining $4,000 of the loan is not secured by anything. So the $7,500 secured portion would be paid through monthly payments in your Chapter 13 plan. The $4,000 unsecured portion is treated like the rest of your unsecured debts, which are usually paid if and only to the extent that you have extra money available to pay them.

Under cramdown, you pay the $7,500 secured portion at an interest rate which is often lower than your contract rate. Paying a reduced amount—$7,500 instead of $11,500—at a lower interest rate results in a lower monthly payment. That payment is often reduced substantially further by extending the repayment term further out than what the contract had provided, up to a maximum of five years (from the date of filing the Chapter 13 case).

In this example, assuming an interest rate of 5% and a repayment term of five years, the payment on the $7,500 would be less than $142 per month. The total remaining payments on the loan, with interest, would be about $8,492, in contrast to paying $12,650 under the contract. That is a savings of $4,158.

Note that under cramdown, even though the repayment term stretches the payments about two and a half years longer than under the contract, the amount of interest to be paid is often less. That’s both because the interest rate is often lower, and it’s being applied to a lower principal amount (here 5% interest instead of 8%, and $7,500 instead of $11,500).

So, by tactically holding off from filing a Chapter 13 case until after the 910-day period expires, in this example you would reduce the monthly payment from $425 to $141.50, and save more than $4,000 before owning the vehicle free and clear. 

 

/by