Posts

Business Litigation that Continues After You File Bankruptcy

If you shut down your business, and file bankruptcy, that often ends business litigation against you. But not in these three situations.

 

Lawsuits against You that Bankruptcy Ends

Many legal claims against you or your closed or closing business are resolved by the filing of your bankruptcy case. They are resolved either legally or practically, or both.

Claims that are legally resolved by your filing of bankruptcy are those intended to make you pay money. Or, claims to determine how much money you must pay. The discharge (the legal write-off) in bankruptcy of whatever debt you owe will usually result in you not needing to pay anything on the claim under Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy.” There’s not much point to a lawsuit to determine whether you owe money or about how much you owe if any such debt will just get discharged in bankruptcy. That’s true regardless how much the debt amount is, and regardless whether there’s a court-determination of the debt or not.

Claims that are practically resolved by your bankruptcy filing are those that are simply not worth pursuing any further. For example, if you file a Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts” case in which the creditors are slated to receive only a few pennies on the dollar, that fact would hugely reduce the benefit of litigation to prove that you owe more money. A simple cost-benefit analysis would show that the very slight possible benefit of further litigation is not worth the addition time or money spent by the creditor.

Lawsuits that Bankruptcy Does NOT End

However, there are certain types of debts that would still need to be resolved by a court. In these situations the creditor would likely get permission from the bankruptcy judge to start a lawsuit or to continue one already started. Here are three types that need court resolution.

1) Determining the Amount of a Debt

If a debt is being discharged in a no-asset Chapter 7 case—one in which all assets of the debtor are “exempt” and protected—then, as indicated above, the amount of that debt makes no practical difference. Whatever the amount of the debt, it is getting discharged without payment of anything towards that debt.

But in an asset Chapter 7 case, in which the bankruptcy trustee is anticipating a pro rata distribution of the proceeds of the sale of assets, the amounts legally owed on all the debts need to be known for that distribution to be fair to all the creditors.  The same holds true in most Chapter 13 cases, in which the creditors are being paid a portion of their debts. That’s because the established amount of any single debt affects the amounts received by all the creditors. So litigation to determine the validity or amount of a debt needs to be completed, even if by a relatively quick settlement (acknowledging the reduced benefit of further litigation because of the reduced stakes at issue for any individual creditor).

2) Possible Insurance Coverage of the Debt

If a claim against a debtor may be covered by insurance, then the affected parties likely want the dispute to be resolved legally.

That’s because a court needs to determine 1) whether the debtor is liable for damages, 2) whether those damages are covered by the insurance, and 3) whether the policy dollar limits are enough to cover all the damages or instead leave the debtor personally liable for a portion. The following types of business litigation tend to involve insurance coverage issues:

  • vehicle accidents involving the business’ employees or owners, especially those with the complication of multiple drivers (and thus, multiple possible insurance coverages)
  • claims on business equipment damaged by fire or flood, or stolen

In these situations the bankruptcy court will likely give permission for the litigation to continue outside of bankruptcy court, while not allowing the creditor to pursue the debtor as to any amount not covered by the insurance policy limits.

3) Nondischargeable Debts

Some of the biggest fights about business-related debts occur when a creditor argues that its debt should not be discharged in the bankruptcy case.  The grounds for objecting to discharge are quite narrow—in general the debtor must have defrauded the creditor, embezzled or stolen from the creditor, or intentionally and maliciously hurt the creditor or its property.

These discharge fights can happen in both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13. Chapter 13 in the past did not let creditors raise discharge challenges that were allowed under Chapter 7. That changed with the last major changes to the bankruptcy law (in 2005), which for the first time allowed those challenges to be raised in Chapter 13 as well. Since Chapter 13 is often a better solution for debtors who have closed a business (it’s often a better way to deal with business-related debts like payroll and income taxes, for instance), many of the dischargeability challenges by creditors now happen in Chapter 13 cases.

 

/by

Practical Considerations about Accusations of Business Fraud and Bankruptcy

When a small business fails, allegations of fraud against the owner are not uncommon. But they are often handled well in bankruptcy.

 

There are practical reasons why the owner of an unsuccessful small business tends to be accused of causing or contributing to the failure through fraud or misuse of funds. If you are considering closing down your business or have already closed it down, and are getting such accusation or you fear getting them, you want to know how are those accusations going to be handled if you file a bankruptcy case.

Reasons Why Creditors of Business Owners Raise Fraud Objections

A bankruptcy filed after the failure of a business can stir up more objections than a regular consumer bankruptcy case for a number of practical reasons:

  • The relationship between the former business owner and his or her creditor is often more personal and emotional than a simple debtor-creditor relationship. Consider the relationships between the former business’s partners, between the owner and investors who were friends or relatives, or between the owner and an ex-spouse. Because of the mix of business and personal in these relationships, the business failure is taken more personally, with more of a tendency by the creditor to feel cheated. So the decision whether to fight the discharge (legal write-off) of the debt in bankruptcy is made less as a cost-benefit business decision than an emotional one.
  • The business context tends to provide many all-too-convenient opportunities for the debtor to blur the rules or act unscrupulously, especially when financially “desperate.”
  • If a business owner takes certain actions in good faith which could have resulted in success, but the business does not succeed, those same actions can look questionable in hindsight.
  • In these kinds of disputes, there is often more money at stake than in a consumer bankruptcy. At the same time these kinds of creditors, unlike conventional commercial creditors, may not feel that they just can take the loss and walk away. So they tend to fight even if it’s not such a wise business decision to do so.

What Happens in Bankruptcy?

So if you have been accused by a former business partner, investor, or similar business creditor of some sort of business fraud, or fear that you will be so accused, does this mean that you should avoid filing bankruptcy?

You need to discuss your unique circumstances thoroughly with your bankruptcy attorney, likely together with your business or litigation attorney if you have one.

But in general, perhaps surprisingly, for some practical reasons these kinds of accusations often go away, or at least are resolved relatively quickly, when you file bankruptcy.

Reason #1: The “Automatic Stay”

The filing of your bankruptcy case stops, at least temporarily, any litigation against you that is already in progress. And it stops, again at least temporarily, a new lawsuit from being filed against you (and against your business if it is a sole proprietorship). This pause in the litigation gives your creditor the opportunity to reconsider whether continuing to pursue you would really be worthwhile.

Reason #2: Much Harder to Make a Case against You

Your bankruptcy filing changes the legal issues in your favor. It’s more difficult for your creditor to prevail against you. It’s usually easy enough outside of bankruptcy for a creditor to prove that you owe money. But once in bankruptcy, the debt or claim will be discharged—forever written off—unless the creditor establishes much more: that the debt is based on some rather serious bad behavior by you. The creditor has to convince the bankruptcy judge that you owe the debt because you engaged in fraud, misrepresentation, embezzlement or theft, fraud in a fiduciary capacity, or by intentionally and maliciously injuring the creditor or his or property. Much more difficult to do, and unless there is a good case against you most creditors will realize that they are wasting their time and money to try.

Reason #3: Revealing Your Actual Finances

The documents you file under oath in your bankruptcy case should show your disgruntled creditor that even if the case against you succeeded, you don’t have the money to pay a judgment. Perhaps more important, it should show his or her attorney that it’s not economically sensible. Sensible people would think twice paying thousands of dollars in attorney fees and cost on a case that could be very hard to win, and then at best gets them a judgment that could never be collected. Or if it could be collected, it would be so slowly that the risk and effort would simply not be worthwhile.

Conclusion

Although there are reasons for some small business bankruptcies to be contentious, filing bankruptcy can give you big advantages if you are being pursued for an alleged business fraud. You decrease your creditor’s chances of winning and give him or her good reasons to stop pursuing you.

 

/by

Business Disputes that Follow You Into Your Bankruptcy Case

A creditor can challenge the discharge of its debt in bankruptcy. This is not common, but is more so after a debtor closes a business.

 

Why Creditor Challenges Are More Common in Closed-Business Bankruptcies

For the following reasons, creditors tend to object more to the discharge of their debts in bankruptcy cases that are filed after the debtor has operated and closed a business:

  • The amount of debt owed, and thus the amount at stake, tends to be larger than in a conventional consumer case, making objection more tempting to the creditor.
  • In the business context some debtor-creditor relationships can be very personal, so when the business fails, these creditors take it personally. Consider debts between former business-partners who are blaming each other for the failure of the business, or between a business owner and the business’ primary investor who believes the owner drove the business into the ground, or between the contract buyer of a business and its seller in which the buyer feels that the seller misrepresented the profitability of the business. In these situations the aggrieved creditor is more personally motivated to fight the discharge of its debt.
  • The owners of businesses in trouble find themselves desperate to keep their businesses afloat. So they make questionable decisions which then expose them to objections about fraud and such once they file bankruptcy.
  • In the kinds of close creditor-debtor relationships mentioned above, the creditor often has hints about the business owner’s questionable behavior, and so is more likely to believe it has the legally necessary grounds to object.

But Objections to Discharge Are Still Not Very Common

When former business owners hear that any creditor can raise objections to the discharge of its debt, they figure an objection would very likely be raised in their case. But in reality these objections occur much less frequently than might be expected, for the following reasons:

  • The legal grounds under which challenges to discharge must be raised are quite narrow. To be successful a creditor has to prove that the debtor engaged in rather egregious behavior, such as fraud in incurring the debt, embezzlement, larceny, fraud as a fiduciary, or intentional and malicious injury to property. These are not easy to prove, so creditors do not tend to try unless they have a strong case.
  • In his or her bankruptcy case the debtor publically files a set of papers containing quite extensive information about his or her finances, and does so under oath. The debtor is also subject to questioning by the creditors about that information and about anything else relevant to the discharge of his or her debts. If the information on the sworn documents or gleaned from any questioning reveals that the debtor truly has no assets worth pursuing, a rational creditor will often decide not to throw “good money after bad” by raising an objection.

Conclusion

In a closed-business bankruptcy case there are these two opposing tendencies. Challenges to discharge are more likely, especially by certain kinds of closely related creditors. But these challenges are still relatively rare because of the narrow legal grounds for them and the financial practicalities involved. A good bankruptcy attorney will advise you about this, will prepare your bankruptcy paperwork to discourage such challenges, and will help derail any such challenges if any are raised.   

 

/by