Posts

Choosing the Right Solution in a Closed-Business Bankruptcy Case

Whether to file under Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 depends largely on your business assets, taxes, and other nondischargeable debts.

 

Hoping to File a Chapter 7 “Straight Bankruptcy”

Once you’ve closed down your business and are considering bankruptcy, it would be understandable if you preferred to file under Chapter 7 instead of under a Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts.”

After all you’ve been through the last few years trying to keep your business afloat, you just want a fresh, clean start, as quickly as possible. You likely feel like just putting the debts behind you. The last thing you likely want is to do is stretch things out for the next three to five years that a Chapter 13 case would usually take.

Likely Can File Under Chapter 7 Under the “Means Test”

The “means test” determines whether, with your income and expenses, you can file a Chapter 7 case. In my last blog I described how you can avoid the “means test” altogether if more than half of your debts are business debts instead of consumer debts.

But even if that does not apply to you, the “means test” will still not likely be a problem if you closed down your business recently. That’s because the period of income that counts for the “means test” is the six full calendar months before your bankruptcy case is filed. An about-to-fail business usually isn’t generating much income. So, there is a very good chance that your income for “means test” purposes is less than the published median income amount for your family size, in your state. If your prior 6-month income is less than the median amount, by that fact alone you’ve passed the means test and qualified for Chapter 7.

Three Factors about Filing Chapter 7 vs. 13—Business Assets, Taxes, and Other Non-Discharged Debt

The following three factors seem to come up all the time when deciding between filing Chapter 7 or 13:

1. Business assets: A Chapter 7 case is either “asset” or “no asset.” In a “no asset” case, the Chapter 7 trustee decides—usually quite quickly—that all of your assets are exempt (protected by exemptions) and so cannot be taken from you to pay creditors.

If you had a recently closed business, there more likely are assets that are not exempt and are worth the trustee’s effort to collect and liquidate. If you have such collectable business assets, discuss with your attorney where the money from the proceeds of the Chapter 7 trustee’s sale of those assets would likely go, and whether that result is in your best interest compared to what would happen to those assets in a Chapter 13 case.

2. Taxes: It seems like every person who has recently closed a business and is considering bankruptcy has tax debts. Although some taxes can be discharged in a Chapter 7 case, many cannot. Especially in situations in which a lot of taxes would not be discharged, Chapter 13 is often a better way to deal with them. Which option is better depends on the precise kind of tax—personal income tax, employee withholding tax, sales tax—and on a series of other factors such as when the tax became due, whether a tax return was filed, if so when, and whether a tax lien was recorded.

3. Other nondischargeable debts: Bankruptcies involving former businesses get more than the usual amount of challenges by creditors. These challenges are usually by creditors trying to avoid the discharge (legal write-off) of its debts based on allegations of fraud or misrepresentation. The business owner may be accused of acting in some fraudulent fashion against a former business partner, his or her business landlord, or some other major creditor.  These kinds of disputes can greatly complicate a bankruptcy case, regardless whether occurring under Chapter 7 or 13. But in some situations Chapter 13 could give you certain legal and tactical advantages over Chapter 7.

These three factors will be the topics of my next three blogs. After reviewing them you will have a much better idea whether your business bankruptcy case should be in a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13.

 

/by

Close Down Your Small Business, Get a Fresh Financial Start

Closing down a business can leave you with huge debts and no income to pay them. Bankruptcy may be necessary, and be easier than you think.

 

A Business Bankruptcy Means a Messy One?

A bankruptcy cleaning up the financial fallout from a closed business can be more complicated than a consumer bankruptcy case. But is not necessarily so.

In the next few blog posts I will show how a business bankruptcy can be quite a simple and effective solution.

Today I present one way a business bankruptcy can actually be easier than a consumer one. 

How so? Because under certain conditions a business bankruptcy case can avoid the Chapter 7 “means test,” allowing you to legally write off (“discharge”) all your debts quickly.

The Purpose of the “Means Test”

The point of the means test is to require people who have the means to pay a meaningful amount to their creditors over a reasonable period of time to in fact do so. They aren’t allowed to simply discharge their debts.

Essentially this disqualifies people who do not pass the means test from going through a Chapter 7 case, which allows a quick discharge of most debts. Instead they must go through Chapter 13, which generally requires them to pay creditors all that they can afford to pay them over a 3-to-5-year period.

The Challenge of Passing the Means Test

To pass the means test requires either having a relatively low income (no more than the published median income amount for the person’s state and family size) or having enough allowed expenses so that little or no “disposable income” is left over. Again, otherwise you will be stuck in a 3-to-5-year Chapter 13 payment plan.

In many scenarios, a former business owner needing bankruptcy relief would not be able to pass the means test and so would have to go through Chapter 13. For example:

  • If, after closing his business, the owner of that business gets a well-paying job before filing bankruptcy, the income from that job may be larger than the “median income” applicable to her state and family size.
  • If the business was operated by one spouse while the other continued working and earned a good income, that employed spouse’s income alone may bump the couple above their applicable “median income” amount, thereby not passing the “means test.”
  • A former business owner who now earns more than median income can’t deduct monthly payments to secured creditors on business collateral she is surrendering—vehicles and equipment, for example—or for other business expenses, such as rent on the former business premises. This reduces the likelihood that she will have enough allowed expenses to pass the “means test.”

Skip the “Means Test” in Business Bankruptcies

The good news is that you do not have to pass the means test at all if your “debts are primarily consumer debts.” (Section 707(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.) So if your debts are primarily business debts—more than 50%–you avoid the means test altogether.

Let’s be clear about the difference between these two types of debts. A “consumer debt is a “debt incurred by an individual primarily for a personal, family, or household purpose.” (Section 101(8).)  The focus is on the intent at the time the debt was incurred. So, for example, if you had taken out a second mortgage on your home for the clear purpose of financing your business, that second mortgage would likely be considered a business debt for this purpose.

Certainly there are times when the line between a business and consumer debt is not clear. Given what may be riding on this—the ability to discharge all or most of your debts in about four month under Chapter 7 vs. paying on them for up to 5 years under Chapter 13—be sure to discuss this thoroughly with your attorney. Find out if you can avoid the means test under this “primarily business debts” exception. 

 

/by

The “Means Test” Tries to Be Objective

The point of the “means test” is to objectively judge whether you have the means to pay your creditors. But this test is very arbitrary.

 

As we explained in last week’s blog post, the “means test” is supposed to be an objective way to decide who qualifies to file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. That decision used to be more in the hands of bankruptcy judges, who were apparently seen as being too lenient with debtors (which is odd because the majority of the judges are former creditor attorneys!).

The “Objective” Rule

As also discussed in the last blog post, there is a very specific formula for determining if you can do a Chapter 7 case: if your budget shows that you have some money left over each month—some “disposable income”—it all depends on its amount and how it compares to the amount of your debts. This is how “objective” this rule is:

  1. If your “monthly disposable income” is less than $125, then you pass the means test and qualify for Chapter 7.
  2. If your “monthly disposable income” is between $125 and $208, then you go a step further: multiply that “disposable income” amount by 60, and compare that to the total amount of your regular (not “priority”) unsecured debts. If that multiplied “disposable income” amount is less than 25% of those debts, then you still pass the “means test” and qualify for Chapter 7.
  3. If EITHER you can pay 25% or more of those debts, OR if your “monthly disposable income” is $208 or more, then you do NOT pass the means test. BUT you still might be able to do a Chapter 7 case IF you can show “special circumstances,” such as “a serious medical condition or a call or order to active duty in the Armed Forces.”

Where Do Those Crucial Amounts—$125 and $208—Come From?

Notice the huge difference in effect of these numbers. If you have less than $125 to spare, you are “presumed” to qualify for Chapter 7; if you have more than $208 to spare, you are
“presumed” to not qualify for Chapter 7, unless you can show “special circumstances.” And if you have an amount in between, then you must apply that 25% extra condition.

That’s a huge difference in consequences for a spread of only $83 per month.

So where do these hugely important numbers come from?  The Bankruptcy Code actually refers to those numbers multiplied by 60—$7,475 and $12,475. When the law was originally passed in 2005 these amounts were actually $6,000 and $10,000 (therefore, $100 and $167 monthly), but they have been adjusted for inflation since then.

So where did those original $6,000 and $10,000 amounts come from?

They are arbitrary. Why was anything less than $6,000 (now $7,475) considered low enough to allow a Chapter 7 to proceed, while anything more than $10,000 (now $12,475) was considered high enough to not allow it? Some creditor lobbyist or Congressional staffer likely just came up with those numbers, and maybe they were negotiated in Congress. In any event, somewhere in the process Congress decided that it needed to use certain numbers, and those are the ones that made it into the legislation. It’s the law, regardless that there doesn’t seem to be any real principled reason for using those amounts in determining whether a person should or shouldn’t be allowed to file a Chapter 7 case.

The Bottom Line

Sensible or not (and there is a lot in the “means test” which is not!), if your income is under the published median income amount, then you pass the “means test” and can proceed under Chapter 7 (see our earlier blog about that). But if you are over the median income amount, then the amount of your “monthly disposable income” largely determines whether you are able to file a Chapter 7 case. (Remember that most people needing a Chapter 7 case qualify easily by having low enough income, skipping the complications covered in today’s blog post.)

 

/by