Posts

If You File a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy with an Attorney You are Nearly Ten Times More Likely to Reach Your Goal of Writing Off Your Debts

Here’s some hard evidence on why it’s dangerous to file bankruptcy without an attorney.

 

As a bankruptcy attorney, I get many phone calls from people who have tried to file a bankruptcy by themselves and have gotten into trouble, sometimes serious trouble. I also run into similar horror stories about what happens when people file without an attorney when I attend “meetings of creditors”—the usually straightforward, usually short meeting with the bankruptcy trustee that everyone filing bankruptcy must attend. I’ve run into countless example of how dangerous it is to file bankruptcy without an attorney.

But I HAVE wondered whether anybody has actually investigated this question. Now somebody has, and we have some pretty solid evidence to back up what I have been witnessing anecdotally.

“The Do-It-Yourself Mirage: Complexity in the Bankruptcy System”

That is the title to a chapter in a book about bankruptcy called Broke: How Debt Bankrupts the Middle Class. This book is a series of articles about many important current issues in the field, with this one chapter focusing on cases filed by debtors not represented by attorneys (“pro se” filers).

The author of this chapter, Asst. Professor Angela K. Littwin of the University of Texas School of Law, analyzed data from the Consumer Bankruptcy Project, “the leading [ongoing] national study of consumer bankruptcy for nearly 30 years.” Her finding: “pro se filers were significantly more likely to have their cases dismissed than their represented counterparts.”

Very interestingly, she also learned from the data that

consumers with more education were significantly more likely than others to try filing for bankruptcy on their own, but that their education didn’t appear to help them navigate the process. Pro se debtors with college degrees fared no better than those who had never set foot inside a college classroom.

She concluded that after bankruptcy law was significantly amended back in 2005 in an effort to discourage as many people from filing, “bankruptcy has become so complex that even the most potentially sophisticated consumers are unable to file correctly.”

Ten Times More Likely to Get a Discharge of Your Debts

In a closely related study, Prof. Littwin stated that “17.6 percent of unrepresented [Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy”] debtors had their cases dismissed or converted” into 3-to-5-year Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts” cases.  “In contrast, only 1.9 percent of debtors with lawyers met this fate.”  Even after controlling for other factors such as “education, race and ethnicity, income, age, homeownership, prior bankruptcy, whether the debtor had any nonminimal unencumbered assets at the time of the filing,” “represented debtors were almost ten times more likely to receive a discharge than their pro se counterparts.”

Prof. Littwin concluded that “filing pro se dramatically escalates the chance that a Chapter 7 bankruptcy will not provide a person with debt relief.”

 

/by

Why You Should or Should Not Worry about Creditors Objecting in Your Bankruptcy Case

FACT: In bankruptcy, creditors seldom fight the write-off of their debts. Why not? And when DO they tend to fight?

 

Debts That Creditors Must Object To

This blog post is NOT about the kinds of debts that simply can’t be discharged (legally written off), and don’t need the creditor to object for that to happen. Examples of those are child and spousal support obligations, recent income taxes debts, and criminal fines. Those survive bankruptcy without any effect on them.

Instead this is about ordinary debts and the ability of any creditor to raise certain limited kinds of objections to the discharge of its debt.

Your Fears

As you consider whether or not to file bankruptcy, you might be wondering whether doing so would be effective—whether you will succeed in discharging your debts so you no longer have to pay them. And you might also wonder whether it would be emotionally difficult—whether the creditors would give you a bad time and try to make you feel guilty for not paying your debts.

As indicated at the beginning of this blog post, creditors will very seldom raise objections to discharging their debts. So your bankruptcy case will likely result in the discharge of all the debts you expect to discharge, usually without even hearing from most or all of your creditors about it. So your bankruptcy will in most cases be effective and not contentious.

Why Objections Aren’t Usually Raised

But if creditors have a right to object, why don’t they do so? If they can make trouble for you, why don’t they?

Simply because doing so is very seldom worth their trouble.

Why not?

1. Creditors seldom have the factual basis on which to object.

The legal grounds for creditors to object to the discharge of their debts are quite narrow. They need to present evidence that you incurred the debt through fraud or misrepresentation, by theft or embezzlement, by your intentional injury to a person’s body or property, or through some other similar bad act. The biggest reason that creditors don’t raise objections to the discharge of their debts is that they seldom have grounds to do so.

2. It takes money for creditors to object, money they may well not recoup.

Creditors sometimes do have factual grounds to object, for example in relatively common situations such as bounced checks or the use of credit without the intent to repay (just before filing bankruptcy). But even in these situations, creditors often don’t object because they decide it’s not worth the risk that they would just spend more money on objecting without doing any good. They often don’t want to risk spending more money to pay for their staff and for attorney fees only to have the bankruptcy judge decide that the required grounds for objection have not been met.

3. The risk that the creditor would have to pay your attorney fees.

One of the reasons why sensible creditors decide not to object unless they are very confident that they have the grounds to do so is that they risk being ordered to pay your attorney’s fees for defending against their objection. That would happen if the judge decided that “the position of the creditor was not substantially justified.” So if creditors are not very confident of their argument, they could be dissuaded further by the risk of having to pay your costs fighting the objection.

So that’s why most creditors just write off the debt and you hear nothing from them during your bankruptcy case.

When Creditors Tend to Object

Creditors do object sometimes, often involving one of the following two situations:

1. Using leverage against you.

If a creditor thinks it has a sensible case against you, it could raise an objection knowing that you are not willing or able to pay a lot of attorney fees to fight it. The creditor knows that even if you have a good defense to its accusations so that you could well win if the matter went all the way to trial, it would cost you a lot to get to that point. So they raise the objection in hopes of inducing you to enter into a settlement quickly.

2. A Personal Grudge

If a creditor is very angry at you for some reason, he, she, or it might be looking for an excuse to harm you or cause you problems. Ex-spouses and ex-business partners are the most common creditors of this sort, but sometimes more conventional creditors find some reason to pick on you. Irrationality is unpredictable, so it sometime drives an objection even when there are little or no factual grounds for it.

The Creditors’ Firm Deadline to Object

Creditors have a very limited time to raise objections: their deadline is only 60 days after the Meeting of Creditors (so around 3 months after your bankruptcy case is filed).

So, talk with your attorney if you have any concerns along these lines. And then if whatever assurances he or she gives you doesn’t stop you from worrying about this, you’ll at least know that you won’t have long to worry before the creditors’ right to object expires. 

 

/by

What a Simple Chapter 13 Case Looks Like

The most common reason for a Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts” is if you have debts that can’t be written off in a “straight” Chapter 7 case.

 

When Chapter 7 Does Not Discharge Your Debts

My last blog post was about the discharge (legal write-off) of debts under Chapter 7. I concluded with the comment that if you have debts that Chapter 7 doesn’t discharge, Chapter 13 may be the way to go. It provides what is often the safest and most convenient method to deal with debts that you have to pay, while also discharging those debts that would be discharged under Chapter 7. The much longer time that Chapter 13 takes—3 to 5 years instead of as short as 3 to 4 months for most Chapter 7 cases—can be highly worthwhile under the right circumstances.

An Example

Let’s show you one example of the right circumstances. Imagine someone owing $7,000 in IRS debt for 2011 and 2012, $3,000 in back child support, $20,000 in credit cards, and $5,000 in medical bills. The person lost his or her job in late 2010 and used the situation to try to run a one-person business during 2011 and 2012. It made a little money but only barely enough to pay living expenses. There was absolutely no money available to set aside for income taxes. During that period the person also fell behind on child support payments. Then this person found a new job a few months ago that pays less than the one lost in 2010, but at least enough to pay ongoing taxes and support, in addition to living expenses. But the person’s budget leaves only about $400 to pay ALL debts, not nearly enough to pay the minimum amounts on the credit cards, much less anything towards the rest of the debts including the taxes and back support.

What Chapter 7 Would and Would NOT Accomplish

A regular Chapter 7 case would likely discharge the $20,000 in credit cards and the $5,000 in medical bills, but would leave owing the $7,000 to the IRS and the $3,000 in back support. Although discharging $25,000, the person would come out of bankruptcy still $10,000 in debt, owed to two creditors who can be extremely aggressive—the IRS and your ex-spouse or the local support enforcement agency.

Although the IRS might be willing to accept payments of $400 per month, there’s a good chance that your ex-spouse or the support enforcement agency would be able to garnish your wages for the back support, and that would negate any possible arrangement with the IRS. Plus the last thing this person would want at his or her new job is for the payroll office to get a garnishment order for back child support. A previously filed Chapter 7 case would have no power to stop that kind of garnishment.

What Chapter 13 Would Accomplish

In contrast Chapter 13 would be able to stop your ex-spouse or support agency from garnishing for back support—as well as from any action the IRS or any state taxing entity, or virtually any other creditor, could take.

So the person in our example would file a Chapter 13 case, start or continue paying any ongoing monthly child support payments, and would also be sure to have withheld an adequate amount for ongoing income taxes. Then his or her attorney would put together a plan to pay the Chapter 13 trustee $400 per month (based on what is available in his or her budget) for 36 months.

During that period of time neither the IRS, nor the support agency or ex-spouse, nor any other creditors would be able to take any action against the person or any of his or her assets as long as he or she complied with the Chapter 13 plan. That means that he or she kept up the $400 plan payments, and kept current on ongoing tax and support obligations (as provided for in the budget).

Over those three years the trustee would be paid $14,400 ($400 X 36 months), which would pay all the $3,000 in back support and the $7,000 in taxes—usually without any additional interest or penalties from the date of the filing of the Chapter 13 case. The Chapter 13 trustee would also get paid, usually about 5-to-10% of what is being paid into the plan, as would any attorney fees that weren’t paid to the attorney at the beginning of your case.  If there would be any money left over (little or none in this example), that would be divided pro rata among the credit card and medical debts. After the 36 months of payments, any remaining balances on those debts would be discharged. That would leave the person at the end of the Chapter 13 case owing nothing to anyone. The back taxes and support would have been paid off, and he or she would be current on any ongoing income taxes and child support.

So that’s what a simple Chapter 13 case would accomplish and would look like. 

 

/by

Discharge of Your Debts: THE Goal of Bankruptcy

Most debts are “discharged”—written off—in bankruptcy. But some may not be. Can we know in advance which will and will not be discharged?

 

 

Bankruptcy is about Discharge

The point of bankruptcy is to get you a fresh financial start through the legal discharge of your debts.

Both kinds of consumer bankruptcy—Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy” and Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts”—can discharge debts. But most Chapter 13s tend to have other purposes as well, and the discharge usually occurs only 3 to 5 years after the case is filed.

In contrast, most Chapter 7 cases are filed for the single, or at least primary, purpose of discharging debts. Furthermore, in most Chapter 7 cases all debts that the debtors want to discharge are in fact discharged, and this happens within just three months or so after the case is filed.

This blog post focuses on Chapter 7 discharge of debts.

What Debts Get Discharged?

Is there a simple way of knowing what debts will and will not be discharged in a Chapter 7 case?

Yes and no.

We CAN give you a list of the categories of debts that can’t, or might not, be discharged (see below). But some of those categories are not always clear which situations they include and which they don’t. Sometimes whether a debt is discharged or not depends on whether the creditor challenges the discharge of the debt, on how hard it fights for this, and then on how a judge might rule.

Why Can’t It Be Simpler?

Laws in general are often not straightforward, both because life can get complicated and because laws are usually compromises between competing interests. Bankruptcy laws, and those about which debts can be discharged, are the result of a constant political tug of war between creditors and debtors over the last few centuries. There have been lots of compromises, which has resulted in a bunch of hair-splitting laws. 

To give some perspective, believe it or not the original bankruptcy laws in England—from which our bankruptcy laws came—did not include ANY discharge of debts. Bankruptcy was originally designed as a procedure to help creditors collect from debtors, not at all as a legal means of protecting debtors from creditors. So there was no perceived need for a discharge of debts—the creditors could just continue chasing their debtors after the bankruptcy procedure was done!

But Let’s Get Practical

The present reality is much more positive, and usually pretty straightforward:

#1:  All debts are discharged, EXCEPT those that fit within a specified exception.

#2:  There are quite a few of exceptions, and they may sound like they exclude many kinds of debts from being discharged. It may also seem like it’s hard to know if you will be able to discharge all your debts. But it’s almost always much easier than all that. As long as you are thorough and candid with your attorney, he or she will almost always be able to tell you whether you have any debts that will not, or may not, be discharged. Most of the time there are no surprises.

#3:  Some types of debts are never discharged. Examples are child or spousal support, criminal fines and fees, and withholding taxes.

#4:  Some other types of debts are never discharged, but only if the debt at issue fits certain conditions. An example is income tax, with the discharge of a particular tax debt depending on conditions like how long ago those taxes were due and when its tax return was received by the taxing authority.

#5:  Some debts are discharged, unless timely challenged by the creditor, followed by a judge’s ruling that the debt met certain conditions involving fraud, misrepresentation, larceny, embezzlement, or intentional injury to person or property.

#6:  A few debts can’t be discharged in Chapter 7, BUT can be in Chapter 13. An example is an obligation arising out of a divorce other than support (which  can never be discharged).

The Bottom Line

#1: For most people the debts they want to discharge WILL be discharged. #2: An experienced bankruptcy attorney will usually be able to predict whether all of your debts will be discharged. #3: If you have debts that can’t be discharged, Chapter 13 is often a decent way to keep those under control. More about that in my next blog post about Chapter 13.

 

/by

U. S. Bankruptcy Laws Took Very Long to Get Off the Ground

The Constitution empowered Congress to “pass uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies,” which then took more than 100 years to do so.


  • The United State of America started its existence without a national bankruptcy law, and in fact without the ability to have one. The Continental Congress established the United States with its founding constitution consisting of the “Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union,” drafted in 1776-1777. Not ratified by the 13 states until 1781, the Articles of Confederation did not provide for a nationwide bankruptcy system.
  • The American Revolutionary War ended in 1782, the U.S. Constitution was drafted in 1787 and was ratified by the states in 1789.  It did allow for, yet did not of itself create a national bankruptcy law. It merely empowered Congress to “pass uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies”.
  • The Constitution may have thus empowered Congress, but Congress did not do a very good job at this for nearly half our nation’s history. Three different times during the 1800s, a federal bankruptcy law was passed in direct reaction to a financial “panic.” But these federal laws were each repealed after the financial crises were over.
  • During the long periods when there was no nationwide law in effect, the states developed a patchwork of bankruptcy and debtor-creditor laws. But these local laws became more and more cumbersome as commerce became ever more interstate.
  • Finally, Congress passed the Bankruptcy Act of 1898. This is the first one that was not quickly repealed, and lasted 80 years.  This law was inspired by commercial creditors, to help in the collection of debts. However, it included the following very important debtor-friendly provisions: most debts became dischargeable, and creditors no longer had to be paid a certain minimum percentage of their debts.
  • This Bankruptcy Act of 1898 was amended many times, significantly in 1938 in reaction to the Great Depression. Among other things that 1938 amendment added the “chapter XIII” wage earners’ plans, the predecessor to today’s Chapter 13s.
  • The 1978 Bankruptcy Reform Act, the result of a decade of study and debate, gave us the Bankruptcy Code. It has been amended every few years since then, most significantly in 2005 with BAPCPA, the so–called Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act. 
/by

The Truly Amazing History of Bankruptcy Law

Debtors’ prisons? There’s that and a lot more to the very colorful history of bankruptcy law.

 

American bankruptcy law naturally grew out of the law of England during our colonial history. Pre-Revolutionary War bankruptcy laws were extremely different from current law.

  • The first bankruptcy law in England was enacted more than 450 years ago during the reign of Henry VIII. Debtors were called “offenders” under this first law, in effect seen as perpetrators of a property crime against their creditors. The purpose of this law, and as expanded during the following hundred and fifty years, was not to give relief to debtors. Rather it was to provide to creditors a more effective way to collect against their debtors.
  • Given this purpose, it is not surprising that this first law did not give debtors a discharge—a legal write-off—of their debts. In a bankruptcy the assets of the “offender” were seized, sold, and the proceeds distributed to creditors. And then the creditors could still continue pursuing the “offender” for any remaining balance owed.
  • A bankruptcy proceeding could only be started by creditors, not by debtors.  Creditors accused a debtor of an “act of bankruptcy,” such as physically hiding from creditors, or hiding assets by transferring them to someone else.  The current extremely seldom used “involuntary bankruptcy” is a remnant of this.
  • Strangely, only merchants could file bankruptcy. Why? Credit was seen as immoral, with only merchants being allowed to use credit, for whom it was seen as a necessary evil. As the only ones who had access to credit, only merchants had the capacity to become bankrupt.
  • For the following century and a half through the late 1600s, Parliament made the law even stronger for creditors, allowing bankruptcy “commissioners” to break into the homes of “offenders” to seize their assets, put them into pillories (structures with holes for head and hands used for public shaming), and even cut off their ears.
  • Finally in the early 1700s the discharge of debts was permitted for cooperative debtors, but only if the creditors consented!
  • Yet the law still provided for the death penalty for fraudulent debtors (although it was very seldom used).
  • Cooperative debtors received an allowance from their own assets, the very early beginnings of the current Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts.”

So this was the English bankruptcy law that was largely in effect at the time that the U.S. Constitution was adopted. That gives some perspective on what the framers may have had in mind with the Bankruptcy Clause of the U. S. Constitution. That Clause gave Congress power to “pass uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies.” Fortunately the language is so open-ended that it gave bankruptcy laws the opportunity to evolve during the last two hundred fifty years into one infinitely both more compassionate and beneficial for the economy.

But this evolution during our national history was extremely rocky, until surprisingly recently. That is the topic of the next blog. 

 

/by

Chapter 13 Handles Both Older and Newer Income Tax Debts

If you owe a few years of income taxes, Chapter 13 lets you write off those that can be, while giving you time to pay those that must be.

 

Our Example

The last blog post introduced an example of how Chapter 13 can be a particularly good way to handle income tax debts when you owe multiple years of taxes. In that example:

  • Without a bankruptcy, a couple would have to pay about $30,000 to the IRS for back taxes, plus about another $45,000 in medical bills and credit cards, a total of about $75,000. Given their modest income and resulting ability to pay these obligations only very slowly, this couple would almost certainly be subject to many years of collection efforts, lawsuits and garnishments until the obligations were paid off.
  • Under Chapter 13, this same couple would pay only about $18,000—36 months of $500 payments. That’s less than 1/4th of the above $75,000 amount—and substantially less than the taxes alone!. Furthermore, the couple’s monthly payments would be based on their ability to pay. During this payment period their creditors—including the IRS—would be prevented from taking any collection action against them.

How Does Chapter 13 Work to Save So Much on Taxes and Other Debts?

  • Tax debts that are old enough are grouped with the “general unsecured” debts—such as medical bills and credit cards. These are paid usually based on how much money there is left over after paying other more important debts. This means that often these older taxes are paid either nothing or only a few pennies on the dollar.
  • The more recent “priority” taxes DO have to be paid in full in a Chapter 13 case, along with interest accrued until the filing of the case. However: 1) penalties—which can be a significant portion of the debt—are treated like “general unsecured” debts and thus paid little or nothing, and 2) usually interest or penalties stop when the Chapter 13 is filed. These can significantly reduce the total amount that has to be paid.
  • “Priority” taxes—those more recent ones that do have to be paid in full—are all paid before anything is paid to the “general unsecured” debts—the medical bills, credit cards, older income taxes and such. In many cases this means that having these “priority” taxes to pay simply reduces the amount of money which would otherwise have been paid to those “general unsecured” creditors. As a result, in these situations having tax debt does not increase the amount that would have to be paid in a Chapter 13 case, which is after all based on what the debtors can afford. In our example, the couple pays $500 per month because that is what their budget allows. That’s the same amount they would have to pay even if they owed nothing to the IRS! The couple meets their obligations under Chapter 13 by having most of their plan payments go to the IRS recent tax debts, and likely nothing to their other creditors or older IRS debts.
  • The bankruptcy law that stops creditors from trying to collect their debts while a bankruptcy case is active—the “automatic stay”—is as effective stopping the IRS as any other creditor. The IRS can continue to do some very limited and sensible things like demand the filing of a tax return or conduct an audit, but it can’t use the aggressive collection tools that the law otherwise grants to it. Gaining relief from collection pressure from the IRS AND all the rest of the creditors is one of the biggest benefits of Chapter 13.

Deciding Between Chapter 7 and 13 for Income Taxes

If, unlike the example, all of the taxes were old enough to meet the conditions for discharging them under Chapter 7, there would be no need for a Chapter 13 case. On the other hand if more “priority” tax debts had to be paid than in the example, the debtors would have to pay more into their Chapter 13 plan, either through larger monthly payments or for a longer period of time.

There are definitely situations where it is a close call choosing between Chapter 7 or Chapter 13. And sometimes preparing an offer in compromise with the IRS—either instead of or together with a bankruptcy filing—is the best route. To decide which of these is best for you, you need the advice of an experienced bankruptcy attorney to help you make an informed decision and then to execute on it.  

 

/by

Don’t Let a Creditor Get a Judgment Preventing its Debt from Being Written Off in Bankruptcy

Some creditor judgments are very dangerous since the prevent you from writing off the debt later in bankruptcy. Try to avoid judgments.

 

Consequences of Allowing a Judgment

In recent blog posts we’ve written about the most direct reason to avoid letting a creditor which has sued you get a judgment against you–it gives the creditor powerful ways to make you pay the debt, such as by garnishing your paychecks or bank accounts. Also, if you own any real estate, including your home, a judgment usually creates a lien on your real estate, another way to force you to pay the debt.

But there’s another reason we mentioned earlier–you should avoid a judgment whenever possible because it can result in that debt not being written off (“discharged”) when you file bankruptcy. Or even if that debt can be discharged, it may become much more difficult to do so. This blog post is about these kinds of judgments.

How a Judgment Can Affect Whether a Debt Can Later Be Discharged

So how can a judgment turn a debt that could have been discharged into one that can’t, or is much harder to discharge?

A very basic principle of law states that once one court has decided an issue, other courts must respect that decision. The idea is that litigants should be able to use court resources only once to resolve a specific dispute. Once a court decides an issue, the losing party shouldn’t be able to hunt around for another court to hear and decide the same dispute (except for appeals to a higher court).

The original court—usually a state court—could potentially resolve a lawsuit in a way that would later makes the debt not dischargeable under bankruptcy law. A creditor could allege that the person owing the debt incurred it in some fraudulent or inappropriate way. If the lawsuit is resolved with the judgment reflecting that that’s what happened, then later when the debtor files bankruptcy the bankruptcy court would likely be bound by that decision by the original court. The judgment having been previously entered by the original court, the debtor would not have an opportunity to challenge its conclusions after filing bankruptcy.

Many Judgments Do NOT Cause Discharge Problems

Most creditor lawsuits are about only one thing: whether the debt is legally owed. So the judgments arising from such lawsuits usually establish nothing more than that the debt is a valid debt, at a certain amount, plus certain fees and interest. Such judgments, which don’t make any determination about a debtor’s fraudulent or otherwise inappropriate behavior, do not impact the discharge of the underlying debt in a subsequent bankruptcy.

It’s Safer to File Bankruptcy Before a Judgment is Entered

The problem is that it’s not always clear what exactly the initial lawsuit decided in its judgment, and thus whether the judgment makes the debt not dischargeable or at least harder to discharge. Specifically, the language of the judgment may not mesh exactly with the bankruptcy laws about fraudulent debts, which makes difficult to determine whether that issue is still open for determination by the bankruptcy court.

A related question is whether the matter was “actually litigated” if the person against whom the judgment was entered did not appear to defend the lawsuit or did not have an attorney.  In other words you may or may not be able to get your day in bankruptcy court depending on whether in the eyes of the law you really already had your day in the prior court.  

To avoid these kinds of ambiguities, and to avoid the risk of losing your chance to defend your case in bankruptcy court, don’t wait until after a judgment has been entered against you to see a bankruptcy attorney. This is especially critical if a lawsuit’s allegations against you refer to any inappropriate behavior other than not repaying the debt.

The bottom line is that if you get sued by any creditor you should quickly see an attorney, even if you don’t plan on fighting the lawsuit. Getting to an attorney quickly enables you to learn if the lawsuit could lead to a judgment making the debt not dischargeable, or more difficult to discharge, in bankruptcy. If so, you would then have the option of filing the bankruptcy to prevent such a harmful judgment from being entered, instead of being stuck with it if you file a bankruptcy later.

 

/by

Be Able to Write Off More Debts by Not Being Rushed into Filing Bankruptcy Too Quickly

More income taxes and credit card debts can be discharged (written off) by tactically delaying bankruptcy. See an attorney to do this right.

 

Last week we introduced the idea that many of the laws about bankruptcy are time-sensitive. When your case is filed can have significant consequences. Last week we focused on the how timing can affect whether you can file a Chapter 7 case or are forced to do a Chapter 13 one. Today we address how timing of a bankruptcy filing can effect what debts can be discharged.

1. Most Income Taxes Can Be Discharged, with the Right Timing

Federal and state income taxes are forever discharged if you meet a number of conditions. Two of the most important of these conditions are met by just waiting long enough before filing your bankruptcy case:

  • Three years must have passed since the time that the tax return for that tax was due (plus any extension if you asked for one).
  • Two years must have passed since you actually filed the pertinent tax return.

For example, assume a taxpayer owes $10,000 to the IRS for the 2009 tax year. She had asked for an extension to file that year to October 15, 2010, but then did not actually file that tax return until October 31, 2011. The above 3-year condition is met after October 15, 2013, because that is three years after the tax return was due. But the 2-year condition has to be met as well, which would not occur until after October 31, 2013, two years after the actual tax return filing date. So filing a bankruptcy case on or before October 31, 2013 would leave that $10,000 tax debt still owing; filing on November 1, 2013 or after would result in it being discharged forever. Simply waiting this one day makes a difference of $10,000.

2. Recent Credit Card Purchases and Cash Advances More Easily Challenged

If a person incurs a debt without intending to repay it, that creditor can challenge the person’s ability to discharge that debt. It’s considered fraudulent—incurred with the intent to cheat the creditor.

Along the same lines, a debt that was entered into a very short time before the person files bankruptcy understandably leads the creditor to wonder if the person already intended to file bankruptcy at the time of that debt. The law takes this situation and creates a “presumption”: under very specific facts, recent credit card purchases and cash advances are “presumed” to be fraudulent. This presumption does not necessarily mean that that particular portion of the debt is not discharged, but that the creditor has a much easier time making that happen.

Here are the specific facts creating the presumptions. The law says that purchases on a single credit card totaling more than $650 made within 90 days before filing bankruptcy are “presumed” not to be dischargeable. Same thing with cash advances on a single account totaling more than $925 made within 70 days before filing bankruptcy.

As shown in our discussion about income taxes above, a delay in filing the bankruptcy case can also work to your advantage with these presumptions. We can avoid giving a creditor the benefit of these presumptions two ways. First, if possible do not use any credit or make any cash advances in the few months before filing bankruptcy—or certainly no more than the stated threshold dollar amounts on any single credit card. Or second, if you’ve already made such purchases and/or cash advances, we could simply hold off filing bankruptcy until the indicated 70-day and 90-day presumption periods have passed.

Be aware that while doing these would solve the presumption problem, a creditor could still challenge the debt’s discharge. But it needs to have evidence that you incurred a debt which you did not intend to pay, or that there was some other kind of fraud or misrepresentation. But because proving such bad intentions is difficult, such challenges without the benefit of a presumption are relatively rare.

So as long as you avoid filing bankruptcy within the 70/90 day presumption periods, you will significantly reduce the chance that the creditor will challenge the discharge of its debt.

/by

More Good Examples of How Bankruptcy Really Helps Even When You Can’t Write Off Every Debt

Three more very practical ways that bankruptcy works to let you take control of your debts, even those that can’t be written off.


Two blogs ago I gave six reasons why it’s worth looking into bankruptcy even when you can’t discharge (write off) one or more of your debts. Today here are the final three of those reasons, each one paired with a concrete example illustrating it.

Reason #4: Taking control over the amount of the monthly payments.

The taxing authorities, support enforcement agencies, and student loan creditors have extraordinary power to take your money and your assets if you fall behind in paying them. Because of that tremendous leverage, you normally have no choice but to play by their rules about how much to pay them each month. Chapter 13 largely throws their rules out the window.

Let’s say you owe $15,000 to the IRS—including interest and penalties—from the 2010 and 2011 tax years, resulting from a business that failed. You’ve now got a steady job but one that gives you very little to pay the IRS after taking care of your very basic living expenses. The IRS is requiring you to pay that debt, plus ongoing interest and penalties, within 3 years. And it calculates the amount you must pay it monthly without any regard for your other debts, or for your actual living expenses. Even if you did not have unexpected expenses during those 3 years, paying the required amount would be extremely difficult. But if your vehicle needed a major repair or you had a medical problem, keeping up those payments would become absolutely impossible.  But the IRS gives you no choice.

In a Chapter 13 case, on the other hand, the repayment period would stretch out to as long as five years, which lowers the monthly payment amount. And instead of a rigid mandatory monthly payment going to the IRS, how it is paid in Chapter 13 is much more flexible. For example, if in your situation money was very tight now but you could more each month later—for example, after paying off a vehicle loan—you would likely be allowed to make very low or even no payments to the IRS at the beginning, as long as its debt was paid in full by the end. Also, you would be allowed to budget for vehicle maintenance and repairs, and medical costs, and other reasonable expenses, usually much more than the IRS would allow. And if you had unexpected vehicle, medical, or other necessary expenses beyond their budgeted amounts, Chapter 13 has a mechanism for adjusting the original payment schedule. Throughout all this, you’d be protected from the IRS.

 Reason #5: Stopping the addition of interest, penalties, and other costs.

Under the above facts, if you were not in a Chapter 13 case, the IRS would be continuously adding interest and penalties. So that much less of your monthly payment goes to reduce the $15,000 owed, significantly increasing the amount you need to pay each month to take care of the whole debt in the required 3 years.

In Chapter 13, in contrast, unless the IRS has imposed a tax lien, no additional interest is added from the minute the case is filed. No additional penalties get added. So not only do you have more time to pay off the tax debt, and much more flexibility, you have also have significantly less to pay before you finish off that debt.

Reason #6: Focusing on paying off the debt that you can’t discharge by discharging those you can.

This may be obvious but can’t be overemphasized: often the most important and direct benefit of bankruptcy is its ability to clear away most of your debt burden so that you can put your financial energies into the one that remain.

Back to our example of the $15,000 IRS debt, let’s say the person also owes $20,000 in credit cards, $5,000 in medical bills, and a $6,000 deficiency balance on a repossessed vehicle. Discharging these other debts would both free up some of your money for the IRS and avoid the risk that those other creditors could jeopardize your payments to the IRS.   Entering into a mandatory monthly payment arrangement with the IRS when at any moment you could be hit with another creditor’s lawsuit and garnishment is a recipe for failure.

Instead, a Chapter 7 case would very likely discharge all of the credit card, medical and old vehicle loan debts. With then gone you would have a more sensible chance getting through an IRS payment arrangement.

In a Chapter 13 case, you may be required to pay a portion of the credit card, medical and vehicle debts, but in return you get the benefits of getting long-term protection from the IRS, a freeze on interest and penalties, and more flexible payments.

So whether Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 is better for you depends on the facts of your case. Either way, you would pay less or nothing to your other creditors so that you could take care of the IRS. Either way, you would much more likely succeed in becoming tax free and debt free, and would get there much quicker.

/by